Difference between revisions of "Do Not Trust Banks"
(Created page with " It is worse than you think. “People think everything is safe in banking online, when it’s really not.” Most small business owners have no clue about the threats t...") |
m (Protected "Do Not Trust Banks" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite))) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 23:27, 18 December 2018
It is worse than you think.
“People think everything is safe in banking online,
when it’s really not.”
Most small business owners have no clue
about the threats they face
or the liability they assume
when banking online.
Companies that lose money
due to stolen online banking credentials
are almost always on the hook for those losses.
Banks are under no obligation
to reimburse commercial customers victimized by cyber fraud.
"We do not see the error on our side."
Not a banking error.
A critical legal question
that often arises
is whether the thieves compromised the customer’s system
or that of the bank’s.
a ploy by the banks to make us liable for their lack of security.
How the crooks evade security technologies,
how the banks react,
and whether the customers are left holding the (empty) bag
banks are under no legal obligation to reimburse them.
The company hit by the fraud
often goes a month or two without the operating capital.
Banks could do a better job
educating customers about the risks
they face
with banking online,
but that would cause distrust.
--